Carrier Data Sync
You cannot audit what you never received
Everything downstream — the audit, the settlement, the reporting — depends on knowing what the carrier actually did. That data is scattered across tracking updates, documents, portals and email, in a different shape for every carrier. Getting it in, continuously and completely, is the step most systems skip.
Carrier API, tracking API, EDI and portal data normalized into one record — real shipment visibility across every carrier you use, including the ones with no developer portal at all.
What comes back
Not a document library. The facts about the load, in fields you can act on.
Status, continuously
Where the freight is and what has happened to it, refreshed while it moves rather than checked when somebody remembers to look.
Weights and dimensions
What the carrier measured, against what was on the bill of lading. This is the field that decides whether a load reprices, and it arrives while the pallet still exists.
Charges as they appear
Accessorials and corrections as the carrier applies them — not aggregated into a total on an invoice weeks later.
The paperwork, filed
Bills of lading, delivery receipts, weight and inspection certificates — collected against the load and readable as data, not just stored as images.
Including the carriers that make it hard
Plenty of carriers have a clean API. Plenty do not, and those are usually the ones where the data matters most, because nobody else is watching them either. Coverage here is not limited to whoever shipped a developer portal — if the carrier makes the information available at all, it ends up in the same place, in the same shape, as everything else.
One shape, every carrier
Carriers describe status, charges and documents differently. You get one consistent record instead of a per-carrier dialect your team learns to decode in their heads.
No portal round trips
Nobody logs into six carrier sites to check a pro number or pull a delivery receipt. That time is the hidden cost of an operation that looks fully staffed.
Complete, not sampled
Every load, not the ones somebody had time for. Partial data produces an audit that finds only what it happened to look at.
Why this sits between execution and audit
An audit is only as good as what it can see. If the only thing arriving is a carrier invoice, the audit begins after delivery and can compare two documents to each other — which is why most freight audit catches billing errors and misses everything else.
With the carrier's own record of the load arriving as it happens, the comparison changes. A reweigh becomes visible while the freight is still on a dock. An accessorial nobody quoted shows up before it reaches an invoice. That is the difference between auditing in transit and reconciling afterwards, and it depends entirely on this step.
It is also what makes the rest of it trustworthy: the same record feeds settlement, reporting, and anything you pull over the API.
Why the carrier’s own record matters
What you can and cannot prove depends on what arrived, and when.
The Bill of Lading Is the Claim. The Invoice Is the Verdict.
Every LTL billing dispute is the same argument: the BOL said one thing, the invoice says another. What each document actually proves.
Feb 2026LTL for BrokersHow to Win a Reweigh or Reclass Dispute (and Why Most Are Lost Before They Start)
Most reweigh disputes are lost weeks before anyone argues them — at the bill of lading. What the carrier has, what you have, and what actually wins.
Dec 2025AI & OperationsYou Can Only Be As Good As…
In logistics, your outcomes are only as strong as your weakest process. Explore the bottlenecks, data challenges, and best practices for continuous improvement.
Aug 2025Which carriers are you blind on?
Tell us who you ship with — especially the ones with no usable API — and we'll show you what comes back and how quickly.