The Logistics OS
Rating, audit and settlement —
take one piece or the whole platform
Quote it, book it, watch it, check it and bill it — across whichever of parcel, LTL and truckload you actually run. Work in our interface, call it over the API or MCP, or drop a single service into the TMS you already have.
It all runs on one record, which is why the audit already knows what was quoted and the invoice arrives already checked. Built by operators who ran this freight before they wrote software for it.
Where do you fit?
Start with the one that sounds like your problem.
I broker truckload and want to add LTL
Pricing to sell on from day one, guardrails that stop the classic LTL mistakes before the quote leaves, and an audit that protects the margin you did win.
I run LTL and sell managed freight
Customer-specific pricing across a book of contracts, a platform under your own brand, and the audit that keeps a managed account defensible.
I ship parcel and my spend keeps climbing
Analysis of what you actually spend and why, carrier negotiation against it, and audit — run as a service, priced against LTL where that is the cheaper answer.
My quotes don't match my invoices
Carrier APIs, your own contracts and internal rating logic reconciled into one quote — so a bad number is a flag before the load moves, not a surprise at settlement.
Take only the part you need
Most people who land here do not ship all three modes, and nothing here assumes you do. One mode is a perfectly good place to start, and so is one service.
By mode
Only ship LTL? Then it is an LTL system. Only parcel? Then it is a parcel practice. Truckload sits alongside both when you have it, and stays out of the way when you do not.
The reason to have all three in one place is that cross-mode decisions — consolidating parcel into an LTL move, say — need both sides priced. If that is not your problem, you are not paying for it.
By service
Rating on its own. Audit on its own. Carrier data sync on its own. If the system you run is fine except for one thing, replace that thing — it is all available over the API and priced on transactions, so a narrow use stays cheap.
Plenty of customers start with the one piece that is costing them money and never take the rest. That is a legitimate outcome, not a failed sale.
Where the margin actually goes
Rarely one big loss. Usually a few dollars a shipment, thousands of times, in four places:
Costly Rating Errors
Inaccurate quotes that erode margins or surprise customers.
Operational Blind Spots
Lack of true visibility into shipment status and exceptions.
Wasted Resources
Hours spent manually tracking, auditing, and reconciling data.
Reactive Problem-Solving
Fighting fires instead of preventing them.
Five services. Take them in any combination.
Each one runs on its own or as part of the whole platform, and every one of them carries the same Lean Six Sigma process design and API Plus connectivity underneath.
Rating Engine: Hybrid, Not Just an API
More than an API: Picks up where the carriers leave off - combine API & internal rating (RateMatrix+)
Audit: Validating Events, Not Just Costs
In-House Audit: Validate the integrity of the services not just the amount of charges - all before they hit your invoice
Carrier Data Sync: Nothing Missing
Every carrier: Status, weights, dimensions, charges and paperwork — including the carriers who will never hand you an API.
AR/AP: Settlement That Already Agrees
Both sides, one ledger: Payables pre-checked against the quote, receivables generated from the same load. We do not hold your money.
Business Intelligence: Know What You Don't Know
SME-based reporting: Root-cause analysis on your own freight, not a dashboard you still have to interpret.
However many of those you take, you decide how they run: in our interface, underyour own brand, or called directly from your systems over the API or MCP.
Why it is built this way
Most logistics software is written by people who have never had to explain a reclass to a customer. Ours is not. Every workflow here was designed by operators who ran this freight, then built the tooling they wished they had had. More on how we build and run it, and on who we are.
Nothing missing
Every carrier API returns a subset — accessorials that do not price the way the documentation says, rules that live in the tariff, weights and status that arrive thin or late. We go and get the rest.
How we get itIn time
A reweigh caught while the truck is still moving is a correction. The same reweigh at settlement is a dispute. The checking happens before the invoice, not after it.
How we design workflowsReplace one thing
The part that is bleeding you is one part. Take that, keep the system you already run, and pay per transaction — see what each piece replaces.
Where we use AITell us what your freight actually costs you
Whichever piece is bleeding — the quotes that do not match the invoices, the audit nobody has time to run, the month end that takes two weeks — start there. Tell us what it looks like today and we will show you the same freight running through the system.